On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it's an reasonable approach to change *all* literals to be 100% > Python 3.0 compatible.
Well, I'm sure not going to complain if that is the case. :) > When the user specifies the py3k_literal mode than 1L and u'' should > raise a SyntaxError. I'm -0 for no error and -1 for a deprecation > warning with -3. It'd clutter the parser and tokenizer code even more. > The warning isn't required, too. OK, if the warning is more complicated than the SyntaxError, then evidently the SyntaxError is better. -- Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting. http://www.colliberty.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com