You're right, having at least one example in svn helps tremendously. This is super deep code written by Tim Peters, and getting all the details right is tricky...
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Cool, I can live with that. Are all current __future__ statements > > still valid in 3.0? > > Yes, all of them are in __future__.py. But most references to 2 of them > (nested scopes and generators) have been deleted from the C code, in > both 2.6 and 3.0. > > I think it is useful to have a few in the C code, so that there are > examples of how to implement them. But maybe just having them in svn is > good enough, and we should delete the remnants out of the active C > source. Or maybe delete all but one, and leave it #ifdef'd out, which > looks to be the case in 3.0, at least. > > I think the only important part is that all of the __future__ imports > work (and do nothing) in 3.0. > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
