On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:51:48 +0100, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> I think Python needs a dedicated "pragma" syntax; we already have two
>> pragma syntaxes ("from __future__ import" and "# coding"), and I think
>> a syntax designed for expressing pragmas would be much clearer than
>> using existing language features in weird ways to express pragmas. But
>> that's a debate for another day.
>
> See the (rejected) PEP 244.
This PEP wasn't updated explaining the reasons of the rejection, so we
can't tell if those reasons apply to Py3k as well.
--
Giovanni Bajo
Develer S.r.l.
http://www.develer.com
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
