Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> For new code, however, there is an alternative strategy that doesn't 
>> involve 2to3 at all, which is to write code in the "greatest common 
>> subset" of 2.6 and 3.0.
>>
>> As Lennart Regbro pointed out earlier, this common subset is actually 
>> quite large (larger than Guido originally intended, I think), and you 
>> can write some fairly substantial applications in it.
> 
> I think it's worth noting that the subset is large only for 3.0 and 2.6.
> If you need to support 2.5 as well, the subset is significantly smaller;
> and if you also want to support 2.4, the subset is again even smaller.

I'm assuming not only 2.6, but 2.6 with all of the various __future__ 
imports enabled. Anything less than that is not worth considering from a 
practical standpoint. Yes, you can avoid things like print (just don't 
call it), but you can't realistically avoid strings and exceptions in a 
non-trivial program.

> Regards,
> Martin
> 
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to