On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it *is* part of the public interface of io.py, and it *is* the > implementation of the built-in open() function. So I don't think this > should be changed. The module's name is so short that I hope people > won't import * from it. Ok. It just seems to me to be an accident waiting to happen which we could easily avoid. > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Benjamin Peterson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there a reason io.open is in the __all__? It seems to me it would > > redundant and confusing to import a builtin. > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (home page: > http://www.python.org/~guido/<http://www.python.org/%7Eguido/> > ) > -- Cheers, Benjamin Peterson
_______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
