Mark Dickinson <dickinsm <at> gmail.com> writes: > Fair enough. My twisted mind was trying to find ways that size_t > might be something other than long or long long, but that > seems unlikely...
There has been a report where sizeof(size_t) < sizeof(long). It breaks things in the dict implementation: http://bugs.python.org/issue1646068 « On the system I'm porting to, ints and pointers (and ssize_t) are 32-bit, but longs and long longs are 64-bit. » _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
