On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Alexander Belopolsky < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> or sizable. I would say "range(n) is a memory efficient substitute > for [0, 1, ... n-1]" is easier to fit into one's brain that the > current hodgepodge of exceptions. > For what it's worth, I'm -1 on any change that makes range(10**10) an error. I'd like to be able to write for i in range(n): ... without having to stop and worry about whether n is always going to be small enough to avoid an exception, and what to do if there's a possibility that n is large. The common case of range should have a small mental footprint. Indexing a range object, or taking its length, are surely much rarer than simply iterating over it; I don't think the problems with indexing and length are a good reason to impose restrictions on the use of range as an iterable. Mark
_______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com