On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Adam Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * sched > > > > + Replaced by threading.Timer. > > I don't see sched as obsoleted by threading.Timer. It's much simpler > to use (no need for locking) and more efficient (no legions of > sleeping threads). Instead, maybe it should be removed because it's > trivial to reimplement as well as being overshadowed by all the other > event loops built into bigger systems (tk, qt, gtk, twisted, etc)?
Fair enough. I tweaked the reasons. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
