I think about it, and I think that it's two differents way of applying a similar thing,
it's why I wonder, if this can't be good if metaclass and class decorator have the same interface, then we can use a class as a metaclass or as a decorator ?? paul bedaride On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> It's why a want to know how to express the class decorator for making a > >>> comparison > > > > [Georg] > >> > >> A class decorator works exactly like a function decorator, that is, > >> > >> @foo > >> class X: ... > >> > >> is equivalent to > >> > >> class X: ... > >> X = foo(X) > >> > >> This should be all you need to know in order to write a class decorator. > > > > I concur. > > Technically, that's true, but an example wouldn't hurt. Examples also > help understanding the motivation. Even the difference between class > decorators and metaclasses could be explained with examples. (E.g. a > metaclass that auto-registers its classes vs. a class decorator that > registers a class.) > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (home page: > http://www.python.org/~guido/<http://www.python.org/%7Eguido/> > ) > _______________________________________________ > Python-3000 mailing list > Python-3000@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/paul.bedaride%40gmail.com >
_______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
