wesley chun wrote:
On 5/29/08, Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
Except that it works incorrectly for negative numbers.
wow, that is a great point. i didn't think of this either. it makes
it very inconvenient (see below) and makes it more difficult to say
we've completed replaced the '%' operator.
I can't really think of any other way that doesn't involve converting the
number to a string and then operating on that, just to get the sign.
here's one way of doing it without converting to a string first (it's ugly too):
i = -45
'{0}0x{1:x}'.format('-' if i < 0 else '', abs(i))
'-0x2d'
Agreed, ick!
thx for putting it (back) in,
I didn't say I would, I said I would if a decision was reached :) I'd
like to see some more consensus, and I hope that Talin (the PEP author)
chimes in.
Eric.
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
