On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Atsuo Ishimoto wrote: > >> I'm not comfortable with "printable", too. Is "legible" better? This >> is first time for me to see this word in my life :). > > The term "printable" has a long history in computing of > meaning that a character code corresponds to some visual > glyph, even if the display process involved isn't literally > printing. It would be confusing to replace it with something > else now, I think.
Agreed. I'm +1 on everything the PEP specifies. I'll accept it tomorrow. Other developers, please review Atsuo's patch in http://bugs.python.org/issue2630 . -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
