-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[Thanks Eric Smith for pinging me on this one - BAW]
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Python-3000] PEP 3101 str.format() equivalent of '%#o/
x/X'?
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:14:18 -0700
From: Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: python-3000@python.org
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'd check with Barry, but given that .format() is a new feature in
these releases anyway and this is a pretty small addition to one tiny
bit of code I would have been okay with it if I were release manager.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Eric Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I finally have some cycles for this. Is it okay to add '#' to hex,
bin, and
oct for str.format(), even though it's now after the beta?
I didn't say I would, I said I would if a decision was
reached :) I'd
like
to see some more consensus, and I hope that Talin (the PEP
author)
chimes
in.
I agree with Guido; this change is fine to make.
Thanks,
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBSGt7K3EjvBPtnXfVAQKoAwQAgUBvU2IiBgcMKk5dvvfL8/hbplKWyhnC
EXA/GX7tsNSMXzMminC3K8sBtLH+oYP0qU8PNvtjHo+Zb0nbZgoqt3pU1EBs3LAp
5zn5DFAjsiCmZ1C7O5DQF9I8RXYvFQEQSZkP1pa73jGnVayLhCa00Y3PFntV1+EG
0OzX1hopPFY=
=JWdq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
