Filed http://bugs.python.org/issue3331
I added this to the bottom of the report, but perhaps it should be a
discussion topic, not a "bug" per se:
----
One might object that the behavior of the list comprehension is
identical to that of a for-loop:
>>> r = []
>>> for x in range(100):
... if not f(x):
... r.append(x)
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 2, in <module>
File "<stdin>", line 2, in f
StopIteration
However, it can be argued that in Python 3 list comprehensions should be
thought of as "syntatic sugar" for ``list(generator expression)`` not a
for-loop with an accumulator. (This seems to be the motivation for no
longer "leaking" variables from list comprehensions into their enclosing
namespace.)
One interesting question that this raises (for me at least) is whether
the for-loop should also behave like a generator expression. Of course,
the behavior of the generator expression can already be simulated by
writing:
>>> r = []
>>> for x in range(100):
... try:
... if f(x):
... r.append(x)
... except StopIteration:
... break
...
>>> r
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
This raises the question, do we need both a ``break`` statement and
``raise StopIteration``? Can the former just be made into syntatic sugar
for the later? Or is this the hobgoblin of a little mind?
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
