On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From some experiments I just did using bare genexps and calling > next() on them, I don't think anything is being silently caught > in the genexp. What's happening is that the surrounding list() > constructor is performing another level of iteration over the > results of the genexp, and *that* is what's being stopped by > the StopIteration. > > I don't see how this can be fixed, because there's no way for > the list() constructor to know where the StopIteration is coming > from.
Sounds like a good analysis to me. No bug here. Move along, nothing to see here! -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
