On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Fred Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jul 18, 2008, at 1:45 PM, Josiah Carlson wrote: >> >> It's entirely possible that I know very little about what was being >> made available via the bsddb module, but to match the API of what is >> included in the documentation (plus the dictionary interface that it >> supports) shouldn't be terribly difficult. > > > It's also entirely possible that the API isn't interesting if you don't > support existing databases, for many applications.
I see where the confusion was. I'm not suggesting that someone write a new bsddb module, I'm suggesting that we can provide something called, perhaps, on_disk_dictionary, which offers the behavior of bsddb, without using bsddb anywhere, or supporting bsddb files. - Josiah _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
