Hi, I wonder why the ElementTree modules in Py3k's xml.etree still do not follow PEP8 naming (ok, besides the obvious explanation that no-one renamed them so far). Was there a decision that they should keep their name despite the general push towards a uniformly named standard library? Or would it be ok to rename them for the next beta?
Given the fact that most packages that depend on ET already use more than one try-except import for these modules anyway (and likely a separate module that cares for the right import), I don't see the situation becoming any worse by making them PEP8 compliant. Stefan _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
