I agree that this should go in. zlib should return bytes. other read functions and similar modules like bz2module already return bytes. unless i hear objections, i'll commit this in about 12 hours.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Anand Balachandran Pillai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I think the patches for issue 3492 should also be merged in for this beta. > It affects the behaviour of zlib module. I have submitted patches for > zlibmodule.c > and test_zlib.py a few weeks back and they are ready to be merged anytime. > > I am forwarding a message where I discussed this with Antoine, who is > CCed on the bug. > > Thanks > > --Anand > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Antoine Pitrou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:26 PM > Subject: Re: [Python-3000] Beta 3 planned for this Wednesday > To: Anand Balachandran Pillai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Hello Anand, > >> If that is the case is http://bugs.python.org/issue3492 important ? It >> is >> not marked as critical or blocker or anything, but I find it strange >> that zlib in >> Python 3.0 will return bytearrays, if we don't merge the patches. > > Agreed, however I can't do it myself today. You should post your message > to the list or on the bug tracker if you want someone to apply the patch > before the beta. > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > > > > -- > -Anand > _______________________________________________ > Python-3000 mailing list > Python-3000@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/greg%40krypto.org > _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
