Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:22 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I created this bug report against 3.0 yesterday:
>>
>> http://bugs.python.org/issue3799
>>
>> I marked it high priority because it seems to me that all the dbm.* modules
>> should agree on whether they accept strings as keys or require bytes.
>> That's clearly not the case at the moment. I suppose perhaps I should have
>> marked it as a release blocker, but I don't think that's my call.
>>
>
> Well, I think it is your call by being a core developer. If Barry
> disagrees he can lower the priority.
That's the way I've been interpreting it (and while a couple of them
have certainly turned out to be less urgent than I thought after further
analysis, I don't regret getting an explicit decision on them before the
rc went out).
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
