> On Windows, none are available except dbm.dumb and bsddb (presently). > If bsddb is to be removed, can/should one of the other "real" dbm > variants be added to the standard binary, so that Windows users have > at least one usable dbm option?
Which one specifically? What's the licensing implications? For 3.0, I think that is too late. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
