On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Guido van Rossum] >> >> Well, from the number of release blockers it sounds like another 3.0 >> beta is the right thing. For 2.6 however I believe we're much closer >> to the finish line -- there aren't all those bytes/str issues to clean >> up, for example! And apparently the benefit of releasing on schedule >> is that we will be included in OSX. That's a much bigger deal for 2.6 >> than for 3.0 (I doubt that Apple would add two versions anyway). > > With the extra time, it would be worthwhile to add dbm.sqlite to 3.0 > to compensate for the loss of bsddb so that shelves won't become > useless on Windows builds.
So get started already! :-) -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com