-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 18, 2008, at 12:46 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
Barry Warsaw schrieb:
On Nov 18, 2008, at 8:07 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
Barry Warsaw wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Martin suggests, and I agree, that we should release Python 3.0
final and 2.6.1 at the same time. Makes sense to me. That would
mean that Python 2.6.1 should be ready on 03-Dec (well, if Python
3.0 is ready then!).
Should we release 2.6.1rc1, too?
Do we need rc's for point releases?
I think we did them in the past. There probably never was a
significant
change between the rc and the final, but Murphy dictates that once you
stop doing the rc, the final will be embarrassingly broken :)
True. If the rc's are actually tested and help avoid embarrassment
I'm all for them. If it's just extra work that few will test, then
let's skip them and just do brown bag releases if necessary.
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBSSQuGHEjvBPtnXfVAQJCfwQAky+ORhR0LaoZ0nevGBkEkl5LZbP0+A4a
p0puGCnxuY6DVqx38dJUPLqt+wle+Zw9QX4PhhaalbTWyOQScKQk0p0CxagLnTeG
GvlyTQLUM9RxFzolnzcY8mU8ewGnCJp16d7TR40AmMZ/geV/xMDzxL+tPKwiq/5p
C4j+VmFHnMU=
=EGqf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
