Bugs item #1190011, was opened at 2005-04-26 16:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ncoghlan You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1190011&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Parser/Compiler Group: AST Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brett Cannon (bcannon) >Assigned to: Nick Coghlan (ncoghlan) Summary: [AST] distinct code objects not created Initial Comment: >> def f(): return ((lambda x=1: x), (lambda x=2: x)) >> f1, f2 = f() >> id(f1.func_code) != id(f2.func_code) The above does not hold true. It should according to test_compile (reported in HEAD as bug #1048870). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Nick Coghlan (ncoghlan) Date: 2005-05-28 18:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1038590 This seems to be the least of lambda's problems. A number of regression tests currently fail with UnboundLocalErrors, after an argument of the form "lambda (x, y): x" is passed to a function for invocation. Assigning to myself, since I'm about to take a look at the current misbehaviour of lambdas (they must be simpler than genexps, right?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1190011&group_id=5470 _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
