Bugs item #1560179, was opened at 2006-09-17 14:55
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by gbrandl
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1560179&group_id=5470

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Gebetsroither (einsteinmg)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Better/faster implementation of os.path.basename/dirname

Initial Comment:
hi,

basename/dirname could do better (especially on long 
pathnames)

def basename(p):
    return split(p)[1]

def dirname(p):
    return split(p)[0]

both construct base and dirname and discard the unused 
one.

what about that?

def basename(p):
    i = p.rfind('/') + 1
    return p[i:]

def dirname(p):
    i = p.rfind('/') + 1
    return p[:i]

greets,
michael

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1560179&group_id=5470
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list 
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to