Bugs item #1484556, was opened at 2006-05-09 03:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nnorwitz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1484556&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Python Interpreter Core Group: Python 2.4 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Miki Tebeka (tebeka) Assigned to: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz) Summary: Output of KlocWork on Python2.4.3 sources Initial Comment: We're evaluating KlocWork (http://www.klocwork.com), I've ran it on the source of Python 2.4.3 and the output is attached (1562 warnings). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz) Date: 2006-10-03 22:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=33168 Right, all the important changes have been fixed AFAIK. There might be a few that slipped through, but we are in good enough shape. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) Date: 2006-10-03 05:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=21627 Ok, let's close this report, then. We continue to monitor Klocwork, regardless. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Miki Tebeka (tebeka) Date: 2006-10-03 01:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=358087 I don't know, currently KlocWork is way down in my "todo" list :( Looks like I won't be able to continue in this matter any longer, if anyone else want to give a hand ... Miki ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Georg Brandl (gbrandl) Date: 2006-09-30 04:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=849994 Have all KlocWork issues been fixed now, Neal? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Miki Tebeka (tebeka) Date: 2006-06-04 02:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=358087 I'll try to see if I can sneak it in, can't promise anything though ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) Date: 2006-05-31 07:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11375 The Coverity scans also probably report some of the same bugs, so many of these problems may be fixed in the 2.5 trunk. If you're still evaluating, you could try running the tool on the 2.5 trunk (snapshot available from http://svn.python.org/snapshots/) and see if the results are shorter. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) Date: 2006-05-09 21:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=21627 Thanks for these results. Unfortunately, they seem to contain many false positives, so it is unclear how one should proceed with them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1484556&group_id=5470 _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
