Martin v. Löwis <mar...@v.loewis.de> added the comment: > Given the recent multiple additions of "forgotten things" in the ABI, > wouldn't it be better to mark the ABI experimental so that things can > get ironed out in 3.2.1? (especially with user feedback after the > release)
I don't know what would be gained in such a marking, or how the marking could be carried out. I assume that uptake of the ABI is slow either way (marked or not), although you might manage to slow it down further by marking it experimental. I can't see why that would be desirable. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11134> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
