Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > subprocess_errpipe_buffer.patch: Patch for 2.7 which improve by 30% > the dummy benchmark (run /bin/false 10,000 times). It avoids the > creation of the 1 MB buffer: start with a buffer of a single byte > (just to check if there is data or if the pipe was closed).
Does it improve on non-dummy benchmarks? Otherwise I don't think it's worth the trouble. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11314> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
