Reid Kleckner <r...@mit.edu> added the comment: Thanks for fixing the negative timeout issue. I assumed incorrectly that a negative timeout would cause it to check and return immediately if it would otherwise block.
As for the docs, the 3.2/3.3 issue was fixed in [[72e49cb7fcf5]]. I just added a Misc/NEWS entry for 3.3's What's New in [[9140f2363623]]. ---------- status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue5673> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
