Charles-François Natali <neolo...@free.fr> added the comment: So, SOCK_CLOEXEC is available. Note that I don't like the idea of falling back to FD_CLOEXEC since it's not atomic, and some people might rely on this. Can we close this issue?
---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12107> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
