Ross Lagerwall <rosslagerw...@gmail.com> added the comment: >> Also, the pure python implementation of subprocess for posix can now >> be >> updated to use pipe2 if it exists (previously on _posixsubprocess.c >> used it).
> I don't understand the last part :-) > What do you suggest? Perhaps, os.pipe2 can be used if available, then a modified version of _posixsubprocess.cloexec_pipe without the check for pipe2 could be used as a fallback. I'm not sure why there exists both a python and c implementation. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12196> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
