Graham Wideman <initcont...@grahamwideman.com> added the comment: Hi Nick: Thanks for your additional points. Comments inline:
> __all__ only affects import *, and may also affect documentation tools (e.g. > pydoc will respect __all__ when deciding what to display). It has no effect > on attribute retrieval from modules. That's indeed my understanding. So the doc (6. Simple statements) which says that __all__ determines the list of "public names" is a bit of a red herring. Attributes are accessible (ie: public) regardless of whether on the __all__ list. Instead the __all__ list establishes the list of names imported by *, and makes those names reference-able without a module prefix. (Plus gives hints about intent to doc tools.) > pkgutil.extend_path() is used to modify pkg.__path__ attributes, *not* > sys.path. Understood, and perhaps my point was obtuse. I was pointing out that the doc for extend_path discusses .pkg entries which point to package dirs, and that this, it says, is like .pth files. I claim that an entry in a .pth files should NOT point to a package dir, but rather to one level up: to a dir that *contains* package dirs. (Pointing a .pth entry directly at a package dir will break package behavior by exposing the constituent modules to sys.path.) Hence the doc for extend_path is misleadingly suggesting a wrong idea about .pth files. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11553> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
