Terry J. Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> added the comment: If the code were acting exactly as documented, I would consider this a feature request. But "require that the parameter also be an instance of set()" (from original message) is too limited.
>>> set() | frozenset() set() So 'set' in "their operator based counterparts require their arguments to be sets." (doc) seems to be meant to be more generic, in which case 'instance of collections.Set' seems reasonable. To be clear, the doc could be updated to "... sets, frozensets, and other instances of collections.Set." "Both set and frozenset support set to set comparisons. " This includes comparisons between the two classes. >>> set() == frozenset() True so perhaps comparisons should be extended also. ---------- nosy: +terry.reedy _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8743> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
