Bugs item #223616, was opened at 2000-11-27 13:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fdrake You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=223616&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Documentation Group: Feature Request Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) Assigned to: Jeremy Hylton (jhylton) Summary: compiler package needs better documentation. Initial Comment: The compiler package is not documented; this needs to be done before tools are likely to be written on top of it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) Date: 2007-04-10 10:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=3066 Originator: YES I think this is fine, Facundo. All docs need polishing, but that's not a bug so long as they're complete, accurate, and readable. Thanks for checking on this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Facundo Batista (facundobatista) Date: 2007-04-10 09:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=752496 Originator: NO The SVN log reflects that the docs *have* been moved into the Library Reference, and that they have been corrected and polished. Fred, you said they needed polishing in December 2001. From then, corrections have been made from Georg, Raymond, Brett and edloper. I'm closing this, but feel free to reopen it if you think that this docs *still* need more polishing. Regards, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Facundo Batista (facundobatista) Date: 2007-03-28 17:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=752496 Originator: NO This is one of the oldest bugs we have... As the compiler package surely got revised with the inclusion of AST, and the bug was only to remember about polishing... this still needs to be open? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeremy Hylton (jhylton) Date: 2002-03-01 17:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31392 jeremy, get your butt in gear on this! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) Date: 2001-12-21 13:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=3066 I'll note that Jeremy has written basic docs, and they are in the Library Reference. But he really needs to polish them a bit as well, so this stays open but gets a new summary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) Date: 2001-08-10 17:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=3066 Jeremy said he'd work on this next week, so I'm bumping the priority as a reminder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) Date: 2001-01-07 22:48 Message: Jeremy -- is there anything that can be done to make it easier for you to get this done? I think these should really be documented and moved into the library. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=223616&group_id=5470 _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com