STINNER Victor <[email protected]> added the comment:
> So I'd suggest forgetting about this part.
If someone really wants this feature (relative seek of more than 2^63), he/she
should open a new issue.
This issue remembers me a mktime() issue: mktime() may return -1 even if it is
not an error. time_mktime() uses now a sentinel to detect an error:
buf.tm_wday = -1; /* sentinel; original value ignored */
tt = mktime(&buf);
/* Return value of -1 does not necessarily mean an error, but tm_wday
* cannot remain set to -1 if mktime succeeded. */
if (tt == (time_t)(-1) && buf.tm_wday == -1) /* OverflowError */
For lseek, we can rely on errno. Try something like that:
errno = 0;
offset = lseek(...);
if (offset == (off_t)-1 && errno) /* error */
We can write a test using a sparse file... Or maybe a mmap object?
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12545>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
