Nadeem Vawda <nadeem.va...@gmail.com> added the comment: Updated patch attached.
>> Some notes: >> - By doing things this way, we lose the ability to specify custom arguments >> to >> the interpreter with $(TESTPYTHONOPTS). Might this be a problem? > > Yes, some buildbots use it. Can't you add support for it in the test runner? Done. > But test_concurrent_futures is not in the list for example. Done. Out of interest, I measured the running times of the different test targets: quicktest 2m25s test 3m55s testall 8m30s buildbottest 14m50s (these are on a 3-year-old Core 2 Duo laptop) ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file22820/test-runner-v2.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11651> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
