Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > D'oh. I just realized why the -M option wasn't being recognized - I had > passed it > after the actual test name, so it was being treated as another test instead > of an > option. Sorry for the confusion :/ > > As for the actual test results, test_huge_bytes_(32|64)b both pass, but > test_huge_str fails with this traceback:
Can you replace "_2G" with "_4G" in the decorator for that test? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11564> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
