Charles-François Natali <neolo...@free.fr> added the comment: > We can keep this patch in our tree, I understand your position.
I could be missing something, but why do you have this patch in the first place? If it turns out to be useful, then it's of course better to include it upstream, I just don't see what this patch is supposed to solve/improve. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12827> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
