Stefan Krah <stefan-use...@bytereef.org> added the comment: Meador Inge <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > The behavior around '__int__' in previous versions seems somewhat accidental.
I think struct followed the functions in longobject.c, which is not really consistent with respect to duck typing. See also #12965 or http://bugs.python.org/issue1172711#msg48086. But I think that the decision to accept __index__() for both signed and unsigned integer formats is good for consistency. For 'P' I'm not sure, but course it might be used in the wild by now. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12974> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
