Meador Inge <mead...@gmail.com> added the comment: I agree that 'bytecode_instructions' is a long-winded. FWIW, I have worked on or with a fair amount instruction level things and "instruction" or "instr" seem to be the established domain terminology.
Here are a few examples: * Java ASM - http://asm.ow2.org/asm33/javadoc/user/index.html - Classes named 'InsnList', 'InsnNode' * PyPy - https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/src/default/pypy/interpreter/astcompiler/assemble.py - class named 'Instruction' * Python - http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/a06ef7ab7321/Python/compile.c#l45 - struct named 'instr' * binutils - http://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils.git;a=tree - structs, variables, etc ... with use of 'insn' and 'instruction' * gcc - http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=tree - structs, variables, etc ... with use of 'insn' and 'instruction' ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11816> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
