Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment: The new patch looks fine; I'd still like to have the more explicit reference counting in range_hash (see replies on Rietveld).
A few more things: - The patch needs a Misc/NEWS entry before committing; it probably deserves a line in Doc/whatsnew/3.3.rst, too. - The doc update should have a ".. versionchanged:: 3.3" note. - Maybe the range_compare function could be renamed to something that makes it clearer it's just doing an equality comparison rather than a generalized comparison. 'range_equality_check'? Or just 'range_equal' or 'range_equality'? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13201> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
