Tobias Oberstein <tobias.oberst...@tavendo.de> added the comment: I see how you interpret that sentence in the spec, but I would have read it differently:
invalid: 1. ws://example.com/something#somewhere 2. ws://example.com/something#somewhere/ 3. ws://example.com/something#somewhere/foo 4. ws://example.com/something?query=foo#bar valid: 5. ws://example.com/something%23somewhere 6. ws://example.com/something%23somewhere/ 7. ws://example.com/something%23somewhere/foo 8. ws://example.com/something?query=foo%23bar You would take 2. and 3. as valid, but 1. and 4. as invalid, right? But you are right, the spec does not talk about # in path. If above is a valid summary of the question, I'd better take that to the Hybi list to get feedback before rushing into anything with urllib .. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13244> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
