Eli Bendersky <eli...@gmail.com> added the comment: Hmm, I've just notice that this [default=val] pattern already exists in the 're' docs in 2.7, for example:
subn(repl, string[, count=0]) So my change was consistent within the documentation of this module. No doubt, the conventions are currently a mess ;-) I suggest to just convert the whole 're' RST page to the new 3.x convention (i.e. model it after the same RST in the default branch). Is this acceptable? If yes, I will submit a patch for review first. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12875> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
