Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > I see you're comparing 3.2 and default: could you run the same > benchmark on default with and without the patch ?
Same results: -> default branch: 1000 loops, best of 3: 364 usec per loop -> default branch with patch reverted: 10000 loops, best of 3: 185 usec per loop (with kernel 2.6.38.8-desktop-8.mga and glibc-2.12.1-11.2.mga1) And I can reproduce on another machine: -> default branch: 1000 loops, best of 3: 224 usec per loop -> default branch with patch reverted: 10000 loops, best of 3: 88 usec per loop (Debian stable with kernel 2.6.32-5-686 and glibc 2.11.2-10) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11849> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
