Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment:
> Line-buffering should be good enough since in practice errors messages
> are always terminated by a newline.
What I think too.
> I'm hesitant to make it line-buffered by default when directed to a
> file, since this could significantly slow down a program that for some
> reason produces super-voluminous output (e.g. when running a program
> with heavy debug logging turned on).
The slow-down is impressive in relative terms (6x) but the timings are
still small in absolute value:
$ ./python -m timeit -s "f=open('/dev/null', 'a', buffering=4096)"
"f.write('log message\n')"
10000000 loops, best of 3: 0.156 usec per loop
$ ./python -m timeit -s "f=open('/dev/null', 'a', buffering=1)" "f.write('log
message\n')"
1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.961 usec per loop
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13601>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
