Philip Jenvey <[email protected]> added the comment:
Is mro_internal's second call to type_mro_modified still needed? Its comment
makes me suspect that it's not:
type_mro_modified(type, type->tp_mro);
/* corner case: the old-style super class might have been hidden
from the custom MRO */
type_mro_modified(type, type->tp_bases);
----------
nosy: +pjenvey
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13575>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
