Stefan Krah <[email protected]> added the comment:
Eric V. Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> As I look at it a little closer, I think I'm going to change the message to:
> "Invalid format type specified". The code has determined that instead of a
> type that's a single character long, it's received "xx10d". That's because
> "xx" doesn't match any of "[[fill]align][sign][#][0][width][,][.precision]",
> so it must be the "[type]" field.
I think this has the potential of being more confusing for people who are
not very familiar with the format specification mini-language. I didn't
look at the code now, but would the message also be raised for this spec?
format(9, "xx10f")
> I'm open to a better message, though.
IMO "invalid format specifier" is fine. Even the existing error message
is not really terrible.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13811>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
