Dave Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> added the comment: On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 18:05 +0000, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > > > I'm attaching a revised version of the patch that should fix the above > > issue: > > hybrid-approach-dmalcolm-2012-01-25-002.patch > > It looks like that approach will break any non-builtin type (in either C > or Python) which can compare equal to bytes or str objects. If that's > the case, then I think the likelihood of acceptance is close to zero.
How? > Also, the level of complication is far higher than in any other of the > proposed approaches so far (I mean those with patches), which isn't > really a good thing. So would I. I want something I can backport, though. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13703> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com