Tim Golden <m...@timgolden.me.uk> added the comment: On 25/02/2012 08:09, Ezio Melotti wrote: > Even if they know the meaning of "shallow" (which is not a really common word > AFAICT)
FWIW it's pretty much the only way of saying what it means. I've no idea how many people used it last year or anything, but if I needed to express the concept of the opposite of deep I would struggle to find another word. Except, perhaps, the doublespeak-like "not deep". Undeep? Double-plus undeep? ---------- nosy: +tim.golden _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14112> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
