Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > """ > /* We can't do anything if the consumer is too slow, just bail > out */ > if (write(watchdog.wfd, (void *) &x, sizeof(x)) < sizeof(x)) > break; > if (write(watchdog.wfd, data, data_len) < data_len) > break; > """ > > AFAICT, this can't happen, because the write end of the pipe is not in > non-blocking mode (which would solve this issue).
I think my original plan was to put it in non-blocking mode, but I must have forgotten in the end. > 2. instead of using a thread and the faulthandler infrastructure to run > GIL-less, why not simply use a subprocess? It could then simply > parse /proc/<PID>/statm at a regular interval, and print stats to > stdout. It would also solve point 1. I can't think of any drawback off the top of my head, so that sounds reasonable. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14107> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
