Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> added the comment: @RDM: yes, that's insane for this purpose. The size of the solution doesn't match the size of the problem (the problem is non-existent for most people).
@Larry: That seems unnecessarily general. I take full responsibility for fixing the precision at ns. And note that I *am* giving you a way out -- I'm establishing a clear pattern, and if someone really, desperately wants ps or fs, it's completely obvious how to change the API again. But I bet you a case of beer that won't happen in our lifetimes (or in Benjamin's). So the dynamic precision is just unnneeded complexity. ---------- nosy: +gvanrossum _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14127> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
