Éric Araujo <mer...@netwok.org> added the comment: [Paul] > To what? The individual packages? No, I meant distutils2 bugs. I will open them when I get a minute. You’re right that projects using metadata 1.0 or 1.1 don’t have to use a version conforming to PEP 386, and that packaging should warn when using the create and install actions and the check command, not when iterating over installed distributions.
[Tetsuya Morimoto] > I made a patch which checks the "func_name" attribute of function before it > refers. It > works for me. However, I wonder if a function has both "func.im_self" and > "func.func_name"? Tell me the background because I'm newbie for distutils2. It’s not really a distutils2 detail but a general Python thing: functions and methods have these func_name (or __name__ in Python 3) attributes, and the somewhat complicated code in distutils2.pypi uses them to do its thing. Alexis intends to clean up that code a bit and we’ll also need more tests. If you’re new to distutils2, I think this bug is not easy or fun enough and you would have more luck working on another one. ---------- assignee: eric.araujo -> alexis title: distutils2 fails to install a package from PyPI on Python 2.7.2 -> AttributeError in distutils2.pypi.wrapper _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14002> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
